E-240 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and E-240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 941 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | AMD E-Series |
| Power efficiency | 21.47 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne (2021−2024) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 1 June 2021 (3 years ago) | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and E-240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and E-240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and E-240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and E-240 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and E-240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR3 Single-channel |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and E-240.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2021 | 4 January 2011 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 18 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.
E-240, on the other hand, has 94.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and E-240. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE is a desktop processor while E-240 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and E-240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
