AMD A4-4355M vs Intel Core m7-6Y75

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

m7-6Y75
1.51
+190%

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms A4-4355M by 190% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20142707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m7AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years old)27 September 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$393no data
Current price$773 (2x MSRP)$210

Technical specs

Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors1750 Million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1515FP2
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+no data
Smart Response+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR3unknown Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 515AMD Radeon HD 7400G
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes10no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m7-6Y75 1.51
+190%
A4-4355M 0.52

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms A4-4355M by 190% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

m7-6Y75 2314
+187%
A4-4355M 806

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms A4-4355M by 187% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

m7-6Y75 3854
+128%
A4-4355M 1690

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms A4-4355M by 128% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

m7-6Y75 6302
+172%
A4-4355M 2318

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms A4-4355M by 172% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

m7-6Y75 2730
+120%
A4-4355M 1239

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms A4-4355M by 120% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

m7-6Y75 19
+234%
A4-4355M 63.5

A4-4355M outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 234% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

m7-6Y75 2
+243%
A4-4355M 1

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms A4-4355M by 243% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

m7-6Y75 1.08
+108%
A4-4355M 0.52

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms A4-4355M by 108% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m7-6Y75 1.7
+270%
A4-4355M 0.5

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms A4-4355M by 270% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m7-6Y75 1625
+83.8%
A4-4355M 884

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms A4-4355M by 84% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.51 0.52
Integrated graphics card 1.36 0.69
Recency 1 September 2015 27 September 2012
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 17 Watt

The Core m7-6Y75 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4355M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m7-6Y75 and A4-4355M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m7-6Y75
Core m7-6Y75
AMD A4-4355M
A4-4355M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 32 votes

Rate Intel Core m7-6Y75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate AMD A4-4355M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m7-6Y75 or A4-4355M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.