Celeron U3405 vs m5-6Y54

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2158not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency27.12no data
Architecture codenameSkylake-Y (2015)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate4 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier118
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size98.57 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1750 Million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1515BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response+no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/s17.051 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 515Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency900 MHz500 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m5-6Y54 2269
+232%
Celeron U3405 684

Pros & cons summary


Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 18 Watt

m5-6Y54 has 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m5-6Y54 and Celeron U3405, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m5-6Y54
Core m5-6Y54
Intel Celeron U3405
Celeron U3405

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 30 votes

Rate Core m5-6Y54 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m5-6Y54 or Celeron U3405, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.