EPYC 9654 vs Core m3-7Y32

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core m3-7Y32
2017
2 cores / 4 threads
1.78
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.96
+4336%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core m3-7Y32 by 4336% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18994
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data10.10
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core m3AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Genoa
Release date21 April 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$11,805
Current price$914 (3.3x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1515SP5
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 615no data
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes10128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-7Y32 1.78
EPYC 9654 78.96
+4336%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core m3-7Y32 by 4336% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

m3-7Y32 2746
EPYC 9654 122091
+4346%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core m3-7Y32 by 4346% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.78 78.96
Recency 21 April 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 4 192
Cost $281 $11805
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-7Y32 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core m3-7Y32 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-7Y32 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-7Y32
Core m3-7Y32
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 10 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-7Y32 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.