Core i3-9350KF vs Xeon X5698
Aggregate performance score
i3-9350KF outperforms Xeon X5698 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9350KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1747 | 1173 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.11 | 11.25 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i3 |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 14 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 8 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $173 |
| Current price | $997 | $151 (0.9x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-9350KF has 10127% better value for money than Xeon X5698.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9350KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12288 KB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 126 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9350KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 1366 | FCLGA1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 91 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9350KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| SIPP | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9350KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9350KF are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9350KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 37.5 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9350KF.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-9350KF outperforms Xeon X5698 by 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-9350KF outperforms Xeon X5698 by 119% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.23 | 4.88 |
| Recency | 14 February 2011 | 8 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 91 Watt |
The Core i3-9350KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5698 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X5698 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-9350KF is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9350KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
