Core m7-6Y75 vs Core m3-7Y32

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core m3-7Y32
2017
2 cores / 4 threads
1.77
+18.8%
Core m7-6Y75
2015
2 cores / 4 threads
1.49

Core m3-7Y32 outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 19% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19032033
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m3Intel Core m7
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date21 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$393
Current price$914 (3.3x MSRP)$773 (2x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data99 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1515
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-+
Smart Response++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR3DDR3, DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/s29.8 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 615Intel HD Graphics 515
Max video memory16 GB16 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz3840x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1010

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-7Y32 1.77
+18.8%
m7-6Y75 1.49

Core m3-7Y32 outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 19% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

m3-7Y32 2732
+18.2%
m7-6Y75 2312

Core m3-7Y32 outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 18% in Passmark.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

m3-7Y32 265
+29.3%
m7-6Y75 205

Core m3-7Y32 outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 29% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

m3-7Y32 120
+17.6%
m7-6Y75 102

Core m3-7Y32 outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 18% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.77 1.49
Integrated graphics card 1.86 1.36
Recency 21 April 2017 1 September 2015
Cost $281 $393

The Core m3-7Y32 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m7-6Y75 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-7Y32 and Core m7-6Y75, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-7Y32
Core m3-7Y32
Intel Core m7-6Y75
Core m7-6Y75

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 10 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 32 votes

Rate Core m7-6Y75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-7Y32 or Core m7-6Y75, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.