Celeron 847 vs m3-7Y32

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-7Y32
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.54
+431%

Core m3-7Y32 outperforms Celeron 847 by a whopping 431% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22983358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.130.01
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency14.560.73
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date21 April 2017 (8 years ago)19 June 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$134

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

m3-7Y32 has 1200% better value for money than Celeron 847.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus typeOPIDMI 2.0
Bus rate4 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier1111
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 615Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency900 MHz800 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1016

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

m3-7Y32 1.54
+431%
Celeron 847 0.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

m3-7Y32 2720
+438%
Samples: 82
Celeron 847 506
Samples: 474

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.54 0.29
Integrated graphics card 1.63 0.31
Recency 21 April 2017 19 June 2011
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 17 Watt

m3-7Y32 has a 431% higher aggregate performance score, 425.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 325% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core m3-7Y32 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 847 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-7Y32
Core m3-7Y32
Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 32 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 409 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron 847, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.