Ultra 7 155H vs i9-9980XE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9980XE
2018
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
18.34
+16.1%
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.80

Core i9-9980XE outperforms Core Ultra 7 155H by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9980XE and Core Ultra 7 155H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking329433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.94no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency10.5253.40
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,979$503

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9980XE and Core Ultra 7 155H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3622
Base clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature84 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9980XE and Core Ultra 7 155H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9980XE and Core Ultra 7 155H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-9980XE and Core Ultra 7 155H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9980XE and Core Ultra 7 155H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9980XE and Core Ultra 7 155H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9980XE and Core Ultra 7 155H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes448

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9980XE 18.34
+16.1%
Ultra 7 155H 15.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9980XE 29127
+16%
Ultra 7 155H 25105

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-9980XE 7323
Ultra 7 155H 9828
+34.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-9980XE 58001
+3.1%
Ultra 7 155H 56242

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i9-9980XE 13495
+3.6%
Ultra 7 155H 13031

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i9-9980XE 2.74
+31.8%
Ultra 7 155H 3.61

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-9980XE 39
+28.7%
Ultra 7 155H 30

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-9980XE 3736
+56.7%
Ultra 7 155H 2385

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-9980XE 198
Ultra 7 155H 255
+29.1%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-9980XE 2.22
Ultra 7 155H 3.07
+38.3%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i9-9980XE 18.1
+77.5%
Ultra 7 155H 10.2

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-9980XE 6879
Ultra 7 155H 7084
+3%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i9-9980XE 156
+21.8%
Ultra 7 155H 128

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i9-9980XE 207
Ultra 7 155H 296
+43.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-9980XE 15780
+29.5%
Ultra 7 155H 12184

Blender(-)

i9-9980XE 137
Ultra 7 155H 222
+62.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-9980XE 1200
Ultra 7 155H 1764
+47%

7-Zip Single

i9-9980XE 5110
Ultra 7 155H 5398
+5.6%

7-Zip

i9-9980XE 93018
+53.5%
Ultra 7 155H 60595

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.34 15.80
Recency 19 October 2018 14 December 2023
Physical cores 18 16
Threads 36 22
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 28 Watt

i9-9980XE has a 16.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 12.5% more physical cores and 63.6% more threads.

Ultra 7 155H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 489.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-9980XE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 155H in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9980XE is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 155H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9980XE and Core Ultra 7 155H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9980XE
Core i9-9980XE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 102 votes

Rate Core i9-9980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 574 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9980XE or Core Ultra 7 155H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.