Xeon W-3275M vs Core i9-9980HK

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9980HK
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.13
Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.75
+182%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms i9-9980HK by a whopping 182% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking791171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.52
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Xeon W
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-HR (2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$583$7,453
Current price$1084 (1.9x MSRP)$9030 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads1656
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)1.75 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)28 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB2 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9980HK 9.13
Xeon W-3275M 25.75
+182%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core i9-9980HK by 182% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-9980HK 14128
Xeon W-3275M 39834
+182%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core i9-9980HK by 182% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-9980HK 1426
+18.5%
Xeon W-3275M 1203

Core i9-9980HK outperforms Xeon W-3275M by 19% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-9980HK 6299
Xeon W-3275M 11736
+86.3%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core i9-9980HK by 86% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.13 25.75
Recency 23 April 2019 3 June 2019
Physical cores 8 28
Threads 16 56
Cost $583 $7453
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9980HK in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-9980HK is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9980HK and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9980HK
Core i9-9980HK
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 474 votes

Rate Core i9-9980HK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 62 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9980HK or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.