Ryzen 5 8400F vs i9-9900KS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900KS
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 127 Watt
12.26
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.17
+23.7%

Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms Core i9-9900KS by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking623456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.9563.68
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency9.1422.09
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date26 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$513$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 8400F has 482% better value for money than i9-9900KS.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier40no data
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size180 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151AM5
Power consumption (TDP)127 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630N/A
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900KS 12.26
Ryzen 5 8400F 15.17
+23.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900KS 19472
Ryzen 5 8400F 24098
+23.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.26 15.17
Recency 26 May 2019 1 April 2024
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 127 Watt 65 Watt

i9-9900KS has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 8400F, on the other hand, has a 23.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 95.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 8400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9900KS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900KS
Core i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 185 votes

Rate Core i9-9900KS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 258 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900KS or Ryzen 5 8400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.