Celeron N4000C vs i9-8950HK

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-8950HK
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
6.58
+639%
Celeron N4000C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.89

Core i9-8950HK outperforms Celeron N4000C by a whopping 639% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10452561
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency6.5514.04
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-H (2018−2019)no data
Release date2 April 2018 (6 years ago)1 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$583no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 deg C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+-
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory64 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-8950HK 6.58
+639%
Celeron N4000C 0.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-8950HK 10454
+644%
Celeron N4000C 1406

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.58 0.89
Integrated graphics card 3.09 0.87
Recency 2 April 2018 1 April 2019
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 6 Watt

i9-8950HK has a 639.3% higher aggregate performance score, 255.2% faster integrated GPU, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron N4000C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 650% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-8950HK is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4000C in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-8950HK and Celeron N4000C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-8950HK
Core i9-8950HK
Intel Celeron N4000C
Celeron N4000C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 130 votes

Rate Core i9-8950HK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 37 votes

Rate Celeron N4000C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-8950HK or Celeron N4000C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.