Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Core i9-7900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7900X
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
13.65
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
16.11
+18%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms i9-7900X by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking508387
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.74no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Phoenix (Zen 4)
Release date30 May 2017 (7 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999no data
Current price$864 (0.9x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache640 KB512 KB
L2 cache10 MB8 MB
L3 cache13.75 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSocket R4no data
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-7900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7900X 13.65
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 16.11
+18%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Core i9-7900X by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-7900X 21107
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 24912
+18%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Core i9-7900X by 18% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-7900X 1432
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2161
+50.9%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Core i9-7900X by 51% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-7900X 8896
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 9546
+7.3%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Core i9-7900X by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i9-7900X 2148
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2229
+3.8%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Core i9-7900X by 4% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i9-7900X 193
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 266
+38%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Core i9-7900X by 38% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.65 16.11
Recency 30 May 2017 3 May 2023
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 28 Watt

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-7900X in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7900X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7900X
Core i9-7900X
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 196 votes

Rate Core i9-7900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 38 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7900X or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.