Ryzen 7 8700G vs i9-13900K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900K
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.11
+85.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
20.00

Core i9-13900K outperforms Ryzen 7 8700G by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking89283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation62.9547.22
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency27.9528.97
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900K has 33% better value for money than Ryzen 7 8700G.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700AM5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, NX-Bit, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XDNA2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 770AMD Radeon 780M
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900K 37.11
+85.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G 20.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900K 58950
+85.5%
Ryzen 7 8700G 31772

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-13900K 3001
+12.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G 2665

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-13900K 20191
+46.7%
Ryzen 7 8700G 13766

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-13900K 12018
+54.9%
Ryzen 7 8700G 7759

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-13900K 87738
+73.5%
Ryzen 7 8700G 50560

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i9-13900K 20192
+23%
Ryzen 7 8700G 16417

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i9-13900K 2.05
+23.9%
Ryzen 7 8700G 2.54

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-13900K 68
+116%
Ryzen 7 8700G 31

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-13900K 5806
+116%
Ryzen 7 8700G 2693

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-13900K 318
+11.2%
Ryzen 7 8700G 286

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-13900K 3.87
+13.8%
Ryzen 7 8700G 3.4

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i9-13900K 22.9
+54.7%
Ryzen 7 8700G 14.8

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i9-13900K 265
+70%
Ryzen 7 8700G 156

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i9-13900K 419
+26.9%
Ryzen 7 8700G 331

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-13900K 14271
+66.1%
Ryzen 7 8700G 8593

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-13900K 24033
+90.5%
Ryzen 7 8700G 12618

Blender(-)

i9-13900K 84
Ryzen 7 8700G 186
+121%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-13900K 2286
+13.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G 2012

7-Zip Single

i9-13900K 7272
+9.1%
Ryzen 7 8700G 6665

7-Zip

i9-13900K 146984
+94.9%
Ryzen 7 8700G 75427

WebXPRT 3

i9-13900K 368
+9.5%
Ryzen 7 8700G 336

CrossMark Overall

i9-13900K 2580
+35.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G 1902

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i9-13900K 316
+16.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G 271

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i9-13900K 141
Ryzen 7 8700G 300
+114%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.11 20.00
Integrated graphics card 6.16 18.32
Recency 27 September 2022 8 January 2024
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13900K has a 85.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 8700G, on the other hand, has 197.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 8700G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 8700G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Ryzen 7 8700G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1951 vote

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 255 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900K or Ryzen 7 8700G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.