Opteron 152 vs i7-965

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-965
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.16
+700%
Opteron 152
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 104 Watt
0.27

Core i7-965 outperforms Opteron 152 by a whopping 700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-965 and Opteron 152 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18643145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.45no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.570.25
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Venus (2004−2005)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)2 August 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,509no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-965 and Opteron 152 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size263 mm2115 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-965 and Opteron 152 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366939
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt104 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-965 and Opteron 152. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-965 and Opteron 152 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-965 and Opteron 152 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-965 and Opteron 152. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-965 2.16
+700%
Opteron 152 0.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-965 3424
+700%
Opteron 152 428

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 0.27
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 104 Watt

i7-965 has a 700% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 152, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-965 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 152 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-965 is a desktop processor while Opteron 152 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-965 and Opteron 152, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-965
Core i7-965
AMD Opteron 152
Opteron 152

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 24 votes

Rate Core i7-965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Opteron 152 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-965 or Opteron 152, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.