Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-960
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.15
Core i5-10400F
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.42
+292%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-960 by a whopping 292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-960 and Core i5-10400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1769840
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0148.11
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Comet Lake (2020)
Release dateOctober 2009 (14 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$316$155
Current price$129 (0.4x MSRP)$100 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-10400F has 4663% better value for money than i7-960.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-960 and Core i5-10400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus support1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-960 and Core i5-10400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-960 and Core i5-10400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPPno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i7-960 and Core i5-10400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-960 and Core i5-10400F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-960 and Core i5-10400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size24 GB128 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-960 and Core i5-10400F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-960 2.15
i5-10400F 8.42
+292%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-960 by 292% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-960 3333
i5-10400F 13029
+291%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-960 by 291% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-960 491
i5-10400F 1440
+193%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-960 by 193% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-960 1663
i5-10400F 5752
+246%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-960 by 246% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-960 3863
i5-10400F 6719
+73.9%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-960 by 74% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-960 15223
i5-10400F 36564
+140%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-960 by 140% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-960 12.2
i5-10400F 6.25
+95.2%

Core i7-960 outperforms Core i5-10400F by 95% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-960 5
i5-10400F 14
+163%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-960 by 163% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.15 8.42
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Cost $316 $155
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i5-10400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-960 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-960 and Core i5-10400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-960
Core i7-960
Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 132 votes

Rate Core i7-960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12556 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-960 or Core i5-10400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.