Pentium P6300 vs i7-940XM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-940XM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
1.39
+162%
Pentium P6300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53

Core i7-940XM outperforms Pentium P6300 by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-940XM and Pentium P6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22292874
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Pentium
Power efficiency2.391.43
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)9 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,096no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-940XM and Pentium P6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2.27 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz0.27 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate2500 MHz1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size296 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors774 million384 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-940XM and Pentium P6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-940XM and Pentium P6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-940XM and Pentium P6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-940XM and Pentium P6300 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-940XM and Pentium P6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-940XM and Pentium P6300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-940XM and Pentium P6300.

PCIe version22.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-940XM 1.39
+162%
Pentium P6300 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-940XM 2209
+165%
Pentium P6300 834

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.39 0.53
Recency 20 June 2010 9 January 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 35 Watt

i7-940XM has a 162.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Pentium P6300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-940XM is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium P6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-940XM and Pentium P6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-940XM
Core i7-940XM
Intel Pentium P6300
Pentium P6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 63 votes

Rate Core i7-940XM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 8 votes

Rate Pentium P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-940XM or Pentium P6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.