Xeon W-3245 vs Core i7-920

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-920
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.83
Xeon W-3245
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 205 Watt
19.93
+989%

Xeon W-3245 outperforms i7-920 by a whopping 989% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-920 and Xeon W-3245 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1914258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.225.68
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)Intel Xeon W
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateNovember 2008 (15 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$340$1,999
Current price$70 (0.2x MSRP)$4274 (2.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3245 has 366% better value for money than i7-920.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-920 and Xeon W-3245 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus support1333 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C77 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-920 and Xeon W-3245 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,PLGA1366FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-920 and Xeon W-3245. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i7-920 and Xeon W-3245 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-920 and Xeon W-3245 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-920 and Xeon W-3245. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size24 GB1 TB
Max memory channels36
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-920 and Xeon W-3245.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-920 1.83
Xeon W-3245 19.93
+989%

Xeon W-3245 outperforms Core i7-920 by 989% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-920 2837
Xeon W-3245 30824
+986%

Xeon W-3245 outperforms Core i7-920 by 986% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-920 415
Xeon W-3245 1390
+235%

Xeon W-3245 outperforms Core i7-920 by 235% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-920 1428
Xeon W-3245 11659
+716%

Xeon W-3245 outperforms Core i7-920 by 716% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 19.93
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Cost $340 $1999
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon W-3245 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-920 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-920 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3245 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-920 and Xeon W-3245, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-920
Core i7-920
Intel Xeon W-3245
Xeon W-3245

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 388 votes

Rate Core i7-920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon W-3245 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-920 or Xeon W-3245, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.