Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i7-875K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-875K
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.00
Ryzen 7 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.16
+408%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms i7-875K by a whopping 408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-875K and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1847709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2219.66
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Zen+ (2018−2020)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$486$299
Current price$195 (0.4x MSRP)$177 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700 has 8836% better value for money than i7-875K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-875K and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.93 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size296 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-875K and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-875K and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-875K and Ryzen 7 2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-875K and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-875K and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-875K and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-875K 2.00
Ryzen 7 2700 10.16
+408%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-875K by 408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-875K 3093
Ryzen 7 2700 15707
+408%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-875K by 408% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-875K 506
Ryzen 7 2700 1113
+120%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-875K by 120% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-875K 1753
Ryzen 7 2700 5494
+213%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-875K by 213% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.00 10.16
Recency 30 May 2010 19 April 2018
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Cost $486 $299
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 7 2700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-875K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-875K and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-875K
Core i7-875K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 61 vote

Rate Core i7-875K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2901 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-875K or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.