Ryzen 9 4900H vs Core i7-870S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-870S
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 82 Watt
1.79
Ryzen 9 4900H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 54 Watt
12.38
+592%

Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms i7-870S by a whopping 592% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-870S and Ryzen 9 4900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1927580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.15no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Release date19 July 2010 (13 years ago)16 March 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$59 $1339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-870S and Ryzen 9 4900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size296 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors774 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-870S and Ryzen 9 4900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FP6
Power consumption (TDP)82 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-870S and Ryzen 9 4900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHA
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-870S and Ryzen 9 4900H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-870S and Ryzen 9 4900H are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-870S and Ryzen 9 4900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s68.27 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-870S and Ryzen 9 4900H.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-870S 1.79
Ryzen 9 4900H 12.38
+592%

Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Core i7-870S by 592% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-870S 2765
Ryzen 9 4900H 19155
+593%

Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Core i7-870S by 593% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.79 12.38
Recency 19 July 2010 16 March 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 82 Watt 54 Watt

The Ryzen 9 4900H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-870S in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-870S is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 4900H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-870S and Ryzen 9 4900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-870S
Core i7-870S
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
Ryzen 9 4900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Core i7-870S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 237 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 4900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-870S or Ryzen 9 4900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.