Pentium M 740 vs i7-870

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-870
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.98
+942%
Pentium M 740
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.19

Core i7-870 outperforms Pentium M 740 by a whopping 942% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-870 and Pentium M 740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19423248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataPentium M
Power efficiency1.970.67
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date8 September 2009 (15 years ago)19 January 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$305no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-870 and Pentium M 740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)32 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size296 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors774 million144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V-1.356V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-870 and Pentium M 740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-870 and Pentium M 740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bit32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-870 and Pentium M 740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-870 and Pentium M 740 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-870 and Pentium M 740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-870 and Pentium M 740.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-870 1.98
+942%
Pentium M 740 0.19

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-870 4007
+179%
Pentium M 740 1435

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-870 5881
+698%
Pentium M 740 737

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.98 0.19
Recency 8 September 2009 19 January 2005
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 27 Watt

i7-870 has a 942.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 740, on the other hand, has 251.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 740 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-870 is a desktop processor while Pentium M 740 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-870 and Pentium M 740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-870
Core i7-870
Intel Pentium M 740
Pentium M 740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1122 votes

Rate Core i7-870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 56 votes

Rate Pentium M 740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-870 or Pentium M 740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.