EPYC 7402P vs i7-720QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-720QM
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.04
EPYC 7402P
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
27.74
+2567%

EPYC 7402P outperforms Core i7-720QM by a whopping 2567% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-720QM and EPYC 7402P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2426171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.44
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.1914.58
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date23 September 2009 (15 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$546$1,250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-720QM and EPYC 7402P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1228
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size296 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-720QM and EPYC 7402P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988TR4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-720QM and EPYC 7402P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE36 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-720QM and EPYC 7402P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-720QM and EPYC 7402P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-720QM and EPYC 7402P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s204.763 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-720QM and EPYC 7402P.

PCIe version2no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-720QM 1.04
EPYC 7402P 27.74
+2567%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-720QM 1657
EPYC 7402P 44070
+2560%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-720QM 301
EPYC 7402P 1190
+295%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-720QM 845
EPYC 7402P 9541
+1029%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 27.74
Recency 23 September 2009 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 180 Watt

i7-720QM has 300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7402P, on the other hand, has a 2567.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7402P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-720QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-720QM is a notebook processor while EPYC 7402P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-720QM and EPYC 7402P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-720QM
Core i7-720QM
AMD EPYC 7402P
EPYC 7402P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 155 votes

Rate Core i7-720QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7402P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-720QM or EPYC 7402P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.