Xeon E3-1230 v2 vs i7-6900K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6900K
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
9.11
+134%
Xeon E3-1230 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
3.90

Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v2 by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6900K and Xeon E3-1230 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8421453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.041.72
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency6.165.35
Architecture codenameBroadwell-E (2016)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,020$360

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1230 v2 has 65% better value for money than i7-6900K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6900K and Xeon E3-1230 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache32 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data160 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6900K and Xeon E3-1230 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt69 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6900K and Xeon E3-1230 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-6900K and Xeon E3-1230 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6900K and Xeon E3-1230 v2 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6900K and Xeon E3-1230 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB32.77 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6900K and Xeon E3-1230 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6900K 9.11
+134%
Xeon E3-1230 v2 3.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6900K 14470
+133%
Xeon E3-1230 v2 6199

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.11 3.90
Recency 31 May 2016 14 May 2012
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 69 Watt

i7-6900K has a 133.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E3-1230 v2, on the other hand, has 102.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-6900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1230 v2 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-6900K is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1230 v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6900K and Xeon E3-1230 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6900K
Core i7-6900K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
Xeon E3-1230 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 114 votes

Rate Core i7-6900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2764 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6900K or Xeon E3-1230 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.