Core i7-5700HQ vs Core i7-6900K
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-5700HQ by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 771 | 1382 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.23 | 0.23 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell-E (2016) | Broadwell-H (2015) |
| Release date | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 2 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,020 | $378 |
| Current price | $186 (0.2x MSRP) | $799 (2.1x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-6900K has 2609% better value for money than i7-5700HQ.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 182 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67° | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | FCBGA1364 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 47 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | no data | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| SIPP | no data | - |
| Smart Response | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
| Max video memory | no data | 32 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.05 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| VGA | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-5700HQ by 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-5700HQ by 139% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-5700HQ by 14% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-5700HQ by 118% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Benchmark coverage: 4%
Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-5700HQ by 114% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.33 | 3.90 |
| Recency | 31 May 2016 | 2 June 2015 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Cost | $1020 | $378 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 47 Watt |
The Core i7-6900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-5700HQ in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6900K and Core i7-5700HQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
