EPYC 9175F vs i7-680UM

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-680UM and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2643	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Core i7	no data
Power efficiency	3.95	no data
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Turin (2024)
Release date	27 May 2010 (14 years ago)	10 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	$317	$4,256

Detailed specifications

Core i7-680UM and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads	4	32
Base clock speed	1.46 GHz	4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.53 GHz	5 GHz
Bus type	DMI 1.0	no data
Bus rate	1 × 2.5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	11	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	4 MB (shared)	512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	4 nm
Die size	81+144 mm2	16x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	382+177 Million	133,040 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-680UM and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	2
Socket	BGA1288	SP5
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-680UM and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	-
AVX	-	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	+	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Core i7-680UM and EPYC 9175F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-680UM and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-680UM and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-800	DDR5
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	12.799 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors	N/A
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	500 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-680UM and EPYC 9175F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-680UM and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	16	128

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	27 May 2010	10 October 2024
Physical cores	2	16
Threads	4	32
Chip lithography	32 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	320 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-680UM and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---