Celeron J3355 vs i7-680UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-680UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.75
Celeron J3355
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.75

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26652664
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency3.947.10
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.46 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1120
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+144 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency500 MHz700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-680UM 0.75
Celeron J3355 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-680UM 1196
Celeron J3355 1197
+0.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 September 2010 30 August 2016
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 10 Watt

i7-680UM has 100% more threads.

Celeron J3355, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355.

Be aware that Core i7-680UM is a notebook processor while Celeron J3355 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-680UM and Celeron J3355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-680UM
Core i7-680UM
Intel Celeron J3355
Celeron J3355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Core i7-680UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 58 votes

Rate Celeron J3355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-680UM or Celeron J3355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.