Celeron G6900T vs i7-680UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-680UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.75
Celeron G6900T
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
2.52
+236%

Celeron G6900T outperforms Core i7-680UM by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26491741
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency3.946.81
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.46 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81+144 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency500 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-680UM 0.75
Celeron G6900T 2.52
+236%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-680UM 1196
Celeron G6900T 4003
+235%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 2.52
Integrated graphics card 0.77 2.85
Recency 26 September 2010 4 January 2022
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt

i7-680UM has 100% more threads, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

Celeron G6900T, on the other hand, has a 236% higher aggregate performance score, 270.1% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 11 years.

The Celeron G6900T is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-680UM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-680UM is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-680UM and Celeron G6900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-680UM
Core i7-680UM
Intel Celeron G6900T
Celeron G6900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Core i7-680UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 676 votes

Rate Celeron G6900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-680UM or Celeron G6900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.