Athlon II X4 631 vs i7-680UM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-680UM
2010, $317
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.68
Athlon II X4 631
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.20
+76.5%

Athlon II X4 631 outperforms Core i7-680UM by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29502535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiencyno data1.29
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date27 May 2010 (15 years ago)17 August 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-680UM and Athlon II X4 631 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.46 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+144 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-680UM and Athlon II X4 631 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FM1
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-680UM and Athlon II X4 631. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-680UM and Athlon II X4 631 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-680UM and Athlon II X4 631 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-680UM and Athlon II X4 631. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-680UM and Athlon II X4 631 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-680UM and Athlon II X4 631.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-680UM 0.68
Athlon II X4 631 1.20
+76.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-680UM 1196
Samples: 13
Athlon II X4 631 2118
+77.1%
Samples: 228

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 1.20
Recency 27 May 2010 17 August 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 100 Watt

i7-680UM has 455.6% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X4 631, on the other hand, has a 76.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores.

The AMD Athlon II X4 631 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-680UM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-680UM is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 631 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-680UM
Core i7-680UM
AMD Athlon II X4 631
Athlon II X4 631

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Core i7-680UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 130 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 631 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-680UM and Athlon II X4 631, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.