Celeron G3900 vs i7-6700K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6700K
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 91 Watt
5.62
+316%
Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.35

Core i7-6700K outperforms Celeron G3900 by a whopping 316% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11492254
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.190.18
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency5.842.51
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date5 August 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$339$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-6700K has 561% better value for money than Celeron G3900.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier4028
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2150 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °C65 °C
Number of transistors1750 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)91 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530Intel HD Graphics 510
Max video memory64 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz950 MHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/AN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6700K 5.62
+316%
Celeron G3900 1.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6700K 8935
+316%
Celeron G3900 2148

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-6700K 1506
+158%
Celeron G3900 584

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-6700K 4941
+395%
Celeron G3900 999

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

i7-6700K 12390
+308%
Celeron G3900 3040

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 1.35
Integrated graphics card 2.60 1.61
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 91 Watt 51 Watt

i7-6700K has a 316.3% higher aggregate performance score, 61.5% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron G3900, on the other hand, has 78.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-6700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6700K and Celeron G3900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6700K
Core i7-6700K
Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1670 votes

Rate Core i7-6700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 225 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6700K or Celeron G3900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.