Core i7-1068NG7 vs Core i7-6700HQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6700HQ
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.22
Core i7-1068NG7
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
5.99
+41.9%

i7-1068NG7 outperforms i7-6700HQ by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6700HQ and Core i7-1068NG7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13501076
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Ice Lake-U (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)1 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6700HQ and Core i7-1068NG7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size122 mm2123 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6700HQ and Core i7-1068NG7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGAIntel BGA 1344
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6700HQ and Core i7-1068NG7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSXno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-6700HQ and Core i7-1068NG7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6700HQ and Core i7-1068NG7 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6700HQ and Core i7-1068NG7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s58.3 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530Iris Plus

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6700HQ and Core i7-1068NG7.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6700HQ 4.22
i7-1068NG7 5.99
+41.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6700HQ 6527
i7-1068NG7 9260
+41.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-6700HQ 1098
i7-1068NG7 1574
+43.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-6700HQ 3436
i7-1068NG7 5256
+53%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.22 5.99
Recency 1 September 2015 1 August 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 28 Watt

i7-1068NG7 has a 41.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 60.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-1068NG7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-6700HQ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6700HQ and Core i7-1068NG7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Core i7-1068NG7
Core i7-1068NG7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 670 votes

Rate Core i7-6700HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 19 votes

Rate Core i7-1068NG7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6700HQ or Core i7-1068NG7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.