Microsoft SQ1 vs Core i7-620UM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-620UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.65

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms i7-620UM by a whopping 468% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-620UM and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26521418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Qualcomm Snapdragon
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date4 January 2010 (14 years ago)2 October 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$278no data
Current priceno data$1873

Detailed specifications

Core i7-620UM and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz3 GHz
Bus support2500 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache4 MB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-620UM and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketBGA1288no data
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620UM and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-620UM and Microsoft SQ1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620UM and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620UM and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsQualcomm Adreno 685
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620UM and Microsoft SQ1 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620UM and Microsoft SQ1.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-620UM 0.65
Microsoft SQ1 3.69
+468%

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms Core i7-620UM by 468% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-620UM 1010
Microsoft SQ1 5704
+465%

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms Core i7-620UM by 465% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-620UM 2111
+293%
Microsoft SQ1 537

Core i7-620UM outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by 293% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-620UM 4004
Microsoft SQ1 4276
+6.8%

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms Core i7-620UM by 7% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 3.69
Recency 4 January 2010 2 October 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm

The Microsoft SQ1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-620UM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620UM and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-620UM
Core i7-620UM
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 12 votes

Rate Core i7-620UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 51 vote

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-620UM or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.