Intel Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i7-5700HQ
Comparing Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Information on Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ integrated GPUs.
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ.
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Let's see how good Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately. Also, your gaming PC must have a decent enough GPU to perform well.
Both CPUs satisfy the 99% minimum and 92% recommended requirements of all games known to us.
Competitors of Core i7-4900MQ from AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-4900MQ from AMD is Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i7-4900MQ:
Competitors of Core i7-5700HQ from AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-5700HQ from AMD is Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i7-5700HQ:
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4900MQ
0.3% better performance in benchmarks
Cheaper ($588 vs $1556)
Higher boost clock speed (3800 vs 3500 MHz)
Higher base clock speed (2800 vs 2700 MHz)
vPro (a marketing umbrella term for several Intel technologies: AMT, TXT, EDB, VT, Anti-Theft and some others)
Intel 64 (64-bit Intel CPU architecture. Almost identical to AMD64, except small and rarely used nuances)
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology - protects the system against viruses and rootkits residing in BIOS or in a boot sector)
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5700HQ
More powerful video core
Much newer (2 June 2015 vs 29 April 2013)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 22 nm)
So, which one is the better CPU?
Technical City couldn't decide between Intel Core i7-4900MQ and Intel Core i7-5700HQ. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-5700HQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.