EPYC 7F52 vs Core i7-4600U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4600U
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.75
EPYC 7F52
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.81
+1375%

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Core i7-4600U by a whopping 1375% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1940169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameHaswell-ULT (2013)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$398$3,100
Current price$441 (1.1x MSRP)$4006 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size118 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,300 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1168SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP+no data
Smart Response+no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI+no data
AMT9.5no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4400no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43200x2000@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3200x2000@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes12no data
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports4no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports4no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4600U 1.75
EPYC 7F52 25.81
+1375%

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Core i7-4600U by 1375% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-4600U 2713
EPYC 7F52 39923
+1372%

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Core i7-4600U by 1372% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4600U 861
EPYC 7F52 1401
+62.7%

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Core i7-4600U by 63% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4600U 1609
EPYC 7F52 9725
+504%

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Core i7-4600U by 504% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.75 25.81
Recency 1 September 2013 14 April 2020
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Cost $398 $3100
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 155 Watt

The EPYC 7F52 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4600U in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-4600U is a notebook processor while EPYC 7F52 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4600U and EPYC 7F52, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4600U
Core i7-4600U
AMD EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7F52

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 147 votes

Rate Core i7-4600U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4600U or EPYC 7F52, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.