A10-6700 vs Core i7-3770K

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-3770K
2012
4 cores / 8 threads
4.18
+108%

Core i7-3770K outperforms A10-6700 by 108% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i7-3770K and A10-6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12871804
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation1.690.52
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)1 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294no data
Current price$133 (0.5x MSRP)$61

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-3770K has 225% better value for money than A10-6700.

Detailed Specifications

Core i7-3770K and A10-6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770K and A10-6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FM2
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770K and A10-6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+1
FMAno dataFMA4
AVX+AVX
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtectno data+
RAIDno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-3770K and A10-6700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770K and A10-6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770K and A10-6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Number of pipelinesno data384
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770K and A10-6700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-3770K and A10-6700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770K and A10-6700.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770K 4.18
+108%
A10-6700 2.01

Core i7-3770K outperforms A10-6700 by 108% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3770K 6462
+107%
A10-6700 3116

Core i7-3770K outperforms A10-6700 by 107% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3770K 710
+57.1%
A10-6700 452

Core i7-3770K outperforms A10-6700 by 57% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3770K 2484
+129%
A10-6700 1087

Core i7-3770K outperforms A10-6700 by 129% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 4.18 2.01
Integrated graphics card 1.17 1.37
Recency 29 April 2012 1 June 2013
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i7-3770K is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770K and A10-6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770K
Core i7-3770K
AMD A10-6700
A10-6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2372 votes

Rate Core i7-3770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 222 votes

Rate A10-6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770K or A10-6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.