Pentium 4 630 vs i7-3770

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3770
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 77 Watt
4.04
+2276%
Pentium 4 630
1 core / 2 threads, 84 Watt
0.17

Core i7-3770 outperforms Pentium 4 630 by a whopping 2276% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3770 and Pentium 4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14073262
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.66no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataPentium 4
Power efficiency4.97no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Prescott 2M
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3770 and Pentium 4 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C67 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770 and Pentium 4 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770 and Pentium 4 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-3770 and Pentium 4 630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770 and Pentium 4 630 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770 and Pentium 4 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770 and Pentium 4 630 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770 and Pentium 4 630.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770 4.04
+2276%
Pentium 4 630 0.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3770 6412
+2257%
Pentium 4 630 272

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.04 0.17
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 84 Watt

i7-3770 has a 2276.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 9.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770 and Pentium 4 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770
Core i7-3770
Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7176 votes

Rate Core i7-3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 125 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770 or Pentium 4 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.