Celeron 1005M vs i7-3689Y

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3689Y
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
1.26
+77.5%
Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.71

Core i7-3689Y outperforms Celeron 1005M by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3689Y and Celeron 1005M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23012702
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency9.001.88
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3689Y and Celeron 1005M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size118 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3689Y and Celeron 1005M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3689Y and Celeron 1005M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+-
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching+-
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i7-3689Y and Celeron 1005M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3689Y and Celeron 1005M are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3689Y and Celeron 1005M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency850 MHz1 GHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3689Y and Celeron 1005M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO++
CRT++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3689Y and Celeron 1005M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3689Y 1.26
+77.5%
Celeron 1005M 0.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3689Y 1967
+77.5%
Celeron 1005M 1108

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 0.71
Recency 8 January 2013 1 July 2013
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 35 Watt

i7-3689Y has a 77.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 169.2% lower power consumption.

Celeron 1005M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

The Core i7-3689Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3689Y and Celeron 1005M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3689Y
Core i7-3689Y
Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-3689Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 249 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3689Y or Celeron 1005M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.