Processor N200 vs i7-3687U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3687U
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.67
+7.1%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

Core i7-3687U outperforms Processor N200 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3687U and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20752123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency9.3024.61
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3687U and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3687U and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3687U and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3687U and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3687U and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3687U and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3687U and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3687U and Processor N200.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes169

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 1.56
Integrated graphics card 1.18 3.29
Recency 8 January 2013 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 6 Watt

i7-3687U has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has 178.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 183.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-3687U and Processor N200.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3687U and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3687U
Core i7-3687U
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 38 votes

Rate Core i7-3687U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3687U or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.