Celeron M 390 vs i7-3610QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3610QM
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.22
+1689%
Celeron M 390
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.18

Core i7-3610QM outperforms Celeron M 390 by a whopping 1689% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3610QM and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16073258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Celeron M
Power efficiency6.770.81
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3610QM and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s400 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3610QM and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCPGA988PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3610QM and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-3610QM and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3610QM and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3610QM and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3610QM and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3610QM and Celeron M 390.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3610QM 3.22
+1689%
Celeron M 390 0.18

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-3610QM 8.72
+1070%
Celeron M 390 102

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.22 0.18
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 21 Watt

i7-3610QM has a 1688.9% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 390, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3610QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 390 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3610QM and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3610QM
Core i7-3610QM
Intel Celeron M 390
Celeron M 390

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 408 votes

Rate Core i7-3610QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3610QM or Celeron M 390, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.