A6 Pro-7050B vs i7-2840QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2840QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.42
+278%
A6 Pro-7050B
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.64

Core i7-2840QM outperforms A6 Pro-7050B by a whopping 278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17792779
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Kaveri
Power efficiency5.093.56
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cache8 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size216 mm2245 mm2
Number of transistors1160 Million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket G2FP3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1600
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data192
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2840QM 2.42
+278%
A6 Pro-7050B 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2840QM 3842
+280%
A6 Pro-7050B 1010

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.42 0.64
Recency 4 September 2011 4 June 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 17 Watt

i7-2840QM has a 278.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

A6 Pro-7050B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 164.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2840QM is our recommended choice as it beats the A6 Pro-7050B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2840QM and A6 Pro-7050B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2840QM
Core i7-2840QM
AMD A6 Pro-7050B
A6 Pro-7050B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 55 votes

Rate A6 Pro-7050B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2840QM or A6 Pro-7050B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.