E1 Micro-6200T vs i7-2715QE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2715QE
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.03
+434%
E1 Micro-6200T
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 3 Watt
0.38

Core i7-2715QE outperforms E1 Micro-6200T by a whopping 434% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19213031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD E-Series
Power efficiency4.279.10
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Mullins (2014)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketIntel BGA1023FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt3.95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2715QE 2.03
+434%
E1 Micro-6200T 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2715QE 3221
+437%
E1 Micro-6200T 600

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 0.38
Recency 3 January 2011 29 April 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 3 Watt

i7-2715QE has a 434.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

E1 Micro-6200T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2715QE is our recommended choice as it beats the E1 Micro-6200T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2715QE and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2715QE
Core i7-2715QE
AMD E1 Micro-6200T
E1 Micro-6200T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2715QE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 29 votes

Rate E1 Micro-6200T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2715QE or E1 Micro-6200T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.