Radeon R2 Graphics vs HD Graphics 3000
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1144 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 77 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | Sandy Bridge | Beema |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 February 2011 (13 years old) | 27 February 2015 (9 years old) |
| Current price | $476 | $289 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 12 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 351 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 995 million | 930 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | unknown | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 13.80 | 2.808 |
| Floating-point performance | 20.4 gflops | 179.2 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on HD Graphics 3000 and Radeon R2 Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | IGP |
| Width | no data | IGP |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 1 February 2011 | 27 February 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 3000 and Radeon R2 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while Radeon R2 Graphics is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
