Celeron J4025 vs i7-2600

Place in the ranking	1575	2526
Place by popularity	62	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.58	2.67
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	3.36	8.80
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date	9 January 2011 (13 years ago)	4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$247	$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4025 has 360% better value for money than i7-2600.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2600 and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	8	2
Base clock speed	3.4 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	2.9 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	56 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	4 MB (shared)
L3 cache	8192 KB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Die size	216 mm²	93 mm²
Maximum core temperature	73 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	1,160 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2600 and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA1155	Intel BGA 1090
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2600 and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2600 and Celeron J4025 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2600 and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2600 and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 2000	Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	1.35 GHz	no data
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2600 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2600 and Celeron J4025.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	16	6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2600 3.37
+262%

Celeron J4025 0.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2600 5346
+262%

Celeron J4025 1477

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2600 612
+86%

Celeron J4025 329

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2600 2050
+280%

Celeron J4025 539

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.37	0.93
Integrated graphics card	0.55	0.87
Recency	9 January 2011	4 November 2019
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	8	2
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	10 Watt

i7-2600 has a 262.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron J4025, on the other hand, has 58.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2600 and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.