Xeon Bronze 3408U vs i7-13700KF

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-13700KF
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
30.44
+388%

Core i7-13700KF outperforms Xeon Bronze 3408U by a whopping 388% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700KF and Xeon Bronze 3408U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1461087
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation68.3427.30
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency10.974.55
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$384$425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13700KF has 150% better value for money than Xeon Bronze 3408U.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700KF and Xeon Bronze 3408U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache768 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB22.5 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700KF and Xeon Bronze 3408U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)125 W, 253 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700KF and Xeon Bronze 3408U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i7-13700KF and Xeon Bronze 3408U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700KF and Xeon Bronze 3408U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700KF and Xeon Bronze 3408U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4000
Maximum memory size192 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700KF and Xeon Bronze 3408U.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13700KF 30.44
+388%
Xeon Bronze 3408U 6.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-13700KF 46589
+387%
Xeon Bronze 3408U 9557

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.44 6.24
Recency 27 September 2022 10 January 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 24 8

i7-13700KF has a 387.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Xeon Bronze 3408U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

The Core i7-13700KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Bronze 3408U in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-13700KF is a desktop processor while Xeon Bronze 3408U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700KF and Xeon Bronze 3408U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700KF
Core i7-13700KF
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U
Xeon Bronze 3408U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 929 votes

Rate Core i7-13700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3408U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700KF or Xeon Bronze 3408U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.