AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs Intel Core i7-10810U

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

i7-10810U
5.35

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 85% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1069688
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesComet LakeRenoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameComet Lake-U (2019−2020)Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2)
Release date2 April 2020 (3 years old)7 May 2020 (3 years old)

Technical specs

Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1528FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s68.27 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-10810U 5.35
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 9.90
+85%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 85% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-10810U 8224
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 15205
+84.9%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 85% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-10810U 6927
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 8379
+21%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-10810U 19287
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 29574
+53.3%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 53% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-10810U 6843
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 11008
+60.9%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 61% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-10810U 5.9
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 3.95
+49.4%

Core i7-10810U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 49% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-10810U 7
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 16
+126%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 126% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-10810U 754
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1410
+87%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 87% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-10810U 182
+0.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 181

Core i7-10810U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 1% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-10810U 1.95
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 2.12
+8.7%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 9% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-10810U 5.7
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 7.1
+23.7%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 24% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-10810U 4837
+14.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 4227

Core i7-10810U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 14% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-10810U 148
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 202
+36.7%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 37% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-10810U 39
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 80
+103%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Core i7-10810U by 103% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.35 9.90
Recency 2 April 2020 7 May 2020
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-10810U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-10810U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-10810U
Core i7-10810U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 49 votes

Rate Intel Core i7-10810U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 121 vote

Rate AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-10810U or Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.