AMD-K5-PR75ABR vs i7-10700F
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-10700F and AMD-K5-PR75ABR processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 757 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | AMD K5 |
Power efficiency | 7.81 | no data |
Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | K5 (1996−1997) |
Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-10700F and AMD-K5-PR75ABR basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 0.08 GHz |
Bus type | no data | FSB |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 50 MT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 1.5 |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 350 nm |
Die size | no data | 161 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 4 Million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-10700F and AMD-K5-PR75ABR compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1200 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10700F and AMD-K5-PR75ABR. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-10700F and AMD-K5-PR75ABR technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10700F and AMD-K5-PR75ABR are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10700F and AMD-K5-PR75ABR. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 4 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10700F and AMD-K5-PR75ABR.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
Threads | 16 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 350 nm |
i7-10700F has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-10700F and AMD-K5-PR75ABR. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-10700F and AMD-K5-PR75ABR, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.