Core i9-13900TE vs Core i7-10700F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-10700F
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.63
+3.9%

Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i9-13900TE by a minimal 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-10700F and Core i9-13900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking676697
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.89no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Raptor Lake-S
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$184 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-10700F and Core i9-13900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-10700F and Core i9-13900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA12001700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10700F and Core i9-13900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-10700F and Core i9-13900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10700F and Core i9-13900TE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10700F and Core i9-13900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10700F and Core i9-13900TE.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-10700F 10.63
+3.9%
i9-13900TE 10.23

Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i9-13900TE by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-10700F 16440
+3.9%
i9-13900TE 15819

Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i9-13900TE by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.63 10.23
Recency 30 April 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-10700F and Core i9-13900TE.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-10700F and Core i9-13900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-10700F
Core i7-10700F
Intel Core i9-13900TE
Core i9-13900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 999 votes

Rate Core i7-10700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate Core i9-13900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-10700F or Core i9-13900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.