Ultra 9 288V vs i7-1068G7
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-1068G7 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 618 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 38.31 |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 1 August 2019 (5 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-1068G7 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | OPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 4 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 23 | no data |
| L1 cache | 320 KB | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-1068G7 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1440 | Intel BGA 2833 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-1068G7 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 59.732 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Arc 140V |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Core Ultra 9 288V.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 August 2019 | 24 September 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 30 Watt |
i7-1068G7 has 7.1% lower power consumption.
Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-1068G7 and Core Ultra 9 288V. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-1068G7 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
