Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-4300U

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i5-4300U
2013
2 cores / 4 threads
1.61
Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads
4.61
+186%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i5-4300U by 186% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19721207
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.17
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$99
Current price$367 (1.3x MSRP)$150 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP+no data
Smart Response+no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4400AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43280x2000@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3200x2000@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1220
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports4no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports4no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-4300U 1.61
Ryzen 3 3200G 4.61
+186%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i5-4300U by 186% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-4300U 2494
Ryzen 3 3200G 7135
+186%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i5-4300U by 186% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-4300U 789
Ryzen 3 3200G 1054
+33.6%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i5-4300U by 34% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-4300U 1463
Ryzen 3 3200G 3020
+106%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i5-4300U by 106% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.61 4.61
Integrated graphics card 1.35 4.49
Recency 1 October 2013 7 July 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Cost $281 $99
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-4300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-4300U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4300U and Ryzen 3 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-4300U
Core i5-4300U
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 177 votes

Rate Core i5-4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2807 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-4300U or Ryzen 3 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.