Celeron D 352 vs i5-4220Y
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2450 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core i5 | no data |
Power efficiency | 8.25 | no data |
Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Cedar Mill (2006) |
Release date | 14 April 2014 (10 years ago) | May 2006 (18 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 16 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | no data | 109 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 69 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 125 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 1.25V-1.325V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1168 | PLGA775 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 11.5 Watt | 86 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
Idle States | + | - |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
GPIO | + | no data |
Smart Connect | + | no data |
FDI | - | no data |
AMT | 9.5 | no data |
Matrix Storage | - | no data |
FSB parity | no data | - |
HD Audio | + | no data |
RST | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | - |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | - |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4200 | no data |
Max video memory | 2 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 850 MHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 11.2/12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
PCI support | - | no data |
USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 4 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 4 | no data |
Integrated IDE | - | no data |
Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 11 Watt | 86 Watt |
i5-4220Y has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 681.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i5-4220Y is a notebook processor while Celeron D 352 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4220Y and Celeron D 352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.