Core i5-4202Y vs Core i5-4200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-4200M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.82
+85.7%

i5-4200M outperforms i5-4202Y by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19212393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i5
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date4 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data
Current price$337 (1.5x MSRP)$548

Detailed specifications

Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB3 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size130 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors960 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA946FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data+
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data+
FDIno data-
AMTno data9.5
Matrix Storageno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data+

Security technologies

Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
Anti-Theft++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600Intel HD Graphics 4200
Max video memory2 GB2 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz850 MHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1211.2/12
OpenGL4.34.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y.

PCIe version32.0
PCI Express lanes1612
PCI supportno data-
USB revisionno data3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data4
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data4
Integrated IDEno data-
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-4200M 1.82
+85.7%
i5-4202Y 0.98

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-4200M 2810
+86%
i5-4202Y 1511

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 86% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-4200M 861
+50.8%
i5-4202Y 571

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 51% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-4200M 1694
+71.1%
i5-4202Y 990

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 71% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i5-4200M 4485
+53.6%
i5-4202Y 2920

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 54% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-4200M 9962
+75.2%
i5-4202Y 5686

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 75% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-4200M 3883
+87.4%
i5-4202Y 2072

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 87% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i5-4200M 17.3
+90.5%
i5-4202Y 32.96

Core i5-4202Y outperforms Core i5-4200M by 91% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i5-4200M 3
+76.1%
i5-4202Y 2

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 76% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-4200M 297
+75.7%
i5-4202Y 169

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 76% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-4200M 118
+59.5%
i5-4202Y 74

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 59% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-4200M 1.35
+55.2%
i5-4202Y 0.87

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 55% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-4200M 1.8
+80%
i5-4202Y 1

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 80% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-4200M 3051
+63.7%
i5-4202Y 1864

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 64% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-4200M 19
+72.1%
i5-4202Y 11

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 72% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-4200M 95
+58.8%
i5-4202Y 60

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 59% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i5-4200M 5708
+57.6%
i5-4202Y 3622

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 58% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i5-4200M 2722
+36%
i5-4202Y 2002

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 36% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i5-4200M 6118
+40.4%
i5-4202Y 4357

Core i5-4200M outperforms Core i5-4202Y by 40% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.82 0.98
Integrated graphics card 1.84 0.95
Recency 4 June 2013 1 September 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 11 Watt

The Core i5-4200M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-4202Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4200M and Core i5-4202Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-4200M
Core i5-4200M
Intel Core i5-4202Y
Core i5-4202Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 423 votes

Rate Core i5-4200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Core i5-4202Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-4200M or Core i5-4202Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.