Celeron N2830 vs i5-3550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3550
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 77 Watt
3.02
+788%
Celeron N2830
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.34

Core i5-3550 outperforms Celeron N2830 by a whopping 788% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3550 and Celeron N2830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16433070
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.56no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5 (Desktop)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency3.714.60
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$205$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3550 and Celeron N2830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.41 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3550 and Celeron N2830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3550 and Celeron N2830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Connectno data+
FDI+no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i5-3550 and Celeron N2830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3550 and Celeron N2830 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3550 and Celeron N2830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 2500Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz750 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3550 and Celeron N2830 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3550 and Celeron N2830.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3550 3.02
+788%
Celeron N2830 0.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3550 4799
+776%
Celeron N2830 548

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-3550 642
+291%
Celeron N2830 164

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-3550 1910
+590%
Celeron N2830 277

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-3550 5191
+338%
Celeron N2830 1185

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-3550 17762
+693%
Celeron N2830 2240

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-3550 6
+609%
Celeron N2830 1

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-3550 1.56
+263%
Celeron N2830 0.43

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.02 0.34
Integrated graphics card 0.69 0.77
Recency 29 April 2012 23 February 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 7 Watt

i5-3550 has a 788.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron N2830, on the other hand, has 11.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 1000% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3550 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2830 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-3550 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2830 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3550 and Celeron N2830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3550
Core i5-3550
Intel Celeron N2830
Celeron N2830

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 645 votes

Rate Core i5-3550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 240 votes

Rate Celeron N2830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3550 or Celeron N2830, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.